Para Elazar fila 27: informar casuísticas de cesión o fusión

Sub-tickets

Activity

• coder03assistant-mba-l-ca created · 2w ago
  parent=#4237
• coder03-mba-l-cc assigned · 1w ago
  coder03assistant-mba-l-ca / coder
• coder03assistant-mba-l-ca progress · 1w ago
  coder03assistant-mba-l-ca | 2026-10-05 12:12 ART. Draft from tracker download 2026-10-02-1248 and BWI 461/621: same-line company transfer remains source Tramite=Modif; Eugenia's 2026-09-30 answer says MovilBA represents it as Baja of the initial company + Alta of the new company. A line cession closes the old line-entity assignment and opens the new one; business date uses paired vehicle periods, not LEA timestamps (621). Fusion legal identity/CUIT survivor rule has no grounded case in this row or those items; draft answer: present the cession rule and ask Elazar to specify the fusion case/identity policy before claiming one. No tracker write yet.
• coder03assistant-mba-l-ca blocked · 1w ago
  Cession answer drafted from Eugenia's rule (461) and shipped line-history behavior (621). Fusion remains underspecified: no concrete fusion case or survivor/CUIT policy in the cited tracker evidence. Need Elazar to identify the fusion scenario/rule before answering that half; do not infer that two legal entities should merge.
• coder03assistant-mba-l-ca progress · 1w ago
  coder03assistant-mba-l-ca | 2026-10-05 15:04 ART. Current tracker file SHA-256 5925d4b94aab44ff63b8e9db9b3999fecd1b358d16f7f58dfcec2c7b30d931fa, Pendientes row 47 keyed MOVILBA-653, already contains the cession answer from MOVILBA-461/621 and leaves fusion pending a survivor/CUIT rule. Keep open only for the fusion decision; proxy live-tab readback requested to confirm online copy.
• coder03-mba-l-cc assigned · 1w ago
  researcher-mba-l-cc / solo
• researcher-mba-l-cc note · 1w ago
  2026-10-08T12:34:26-03:00 researcher-mba-l-cc Condensed from the drafted answer already on the item (2026-10-05), not re-measured. What the book/rules show today: cession (same-line company transfer) is answered - Eugenia's 2026-09-30 rule plus shipped line-history behavior (461/621): MovilBA represents it as Baja of the initial company + Alta of the new one, with the line-entidad assignment closed and reopened on the paired vehicle periods' business dates, not LEA timestamps. Fusion has no answer: no concrete fusion case and no survivor/CUIT-identity rule appears anywhere in the cited tracker evidence or linked items. Short question for Elazar, ready as asked: cession's answer ships as-is (no open point). For fusion, name one concrete case (which two entities, which CUIT survives) so the representation rule can be derived the same way cession's was - do not infer a merge-identity policy without a real example, since treating two legal entities as one without his word is a business decision, not a data-model default.
• coder03-mba-l-cc note · 1w ago
  Elazar decision 2026-10-09 (CLI): fusion rule - surviving CUIT is informed/named; losing CUIT stays recorded in historial de cambio; buses/lineas get assigned to the surviving CUIT as if transferred (same mechanics as cesion/621). researcher: write both halves (cesion+fusion) to tracker Resueltos and close.
• researcher-mba-l-cc note · 1w ago
  2026-10-09T15:10:08Z. Both halves drafted for tracker Resueltos (Estado=Resuelto), handoff to coder03 for the XLSX write - researcher does not write it. CESION: representado como Baja de la empresa inicial + Alta de la nueva; el vinculo linea-entidad se cierra y reabre en las fechas de negocio de los periodos pareados del vehiculo, no en timestamps de LEA. Fuente: regla de Eugenia 2026-09-30 + comportamiento shipeado MOVILBA-461/621. FUSION: el CUIT sobreviviente se informa/nombra; el CUIT perdedor queda registrado en el historial de cambio; buses y lineas se asignan al CUIT sobreviviente como si fueran transferidos - misma mecanica que cesion/621. Fuente: decision de Elazar 2026-10-09 (CLI, via coder03).
• coder03-mba-l-cc note · 1w ago
  Written to tracker Resueltos (cesion+fusion, both halves), archived copy 2026-10-09-1210. Closing.
• coder03-mba-l-cc unblocked · 1w ago
  cleared: Cession answer drafted from Eugenia's rule (461) and shipped line-history behavior (621). Fusion remains underspecified: no concrete fusion case or survivor/CUIT policy in the cited tracker evidence. Need Elazar to identify the fusion scenario/rule before answering that half; do not infer that two legal entities should merge.
• coder03-mba-l-cc completed · 1w ago
  completed