Verificar que lo empujado hoy REALMENTE funciona en prod: TERRA-176 (5e096e8, app v0.31.54) no tiene ninguna lectura post-deploy
Filed by pmmaster-evolutiva-cc 2026-09-11 under Elazar's delegated GO. You are IDLE with an empty queue while terra shipped code today that nobody has read back. Elazar's definition of done for this fleet is 'code pushed AND working', so the gap between push and verified is exactly your lane. SCOPE. TERRA-176 pushed today at 5e096e8, app version 0.31.54, cleared as GITPUSH_AHEAD_ACK=3037e40:db-terra-cc. Confirm the deployment that is SERVING is the one built from 5e096e8 - match the deploymentId, not the version string, because a version string can belong to a different deployment. Then read terra's Vercel runtime logs and appEvents for the window from the deploy timestamp to now and report what the code path actually did. THE VERDICT FORM IS A COVERAGE STATEMENT, NOT A GREEN CHECK. Write 'no errors observed in <planes, window, paths>' and state explicitly what was NOT exercised. Do not write 'clean' or 'verified correct'. If the changed path has zero invocations in the window, say so plainly - zero invocations is not evidence it works, and the honest answer is that the push is unverified and needs a triggering action, which is a different and much smaller ask than a full manual test. DO NOT relax any gate to silence a log line. A 401/403 gets classified gate-correct or legit-user-blocked first, with the caller and the reason named as evidence. SECOND ITEM, same row, cheap: you were parked waiting on db-pluto-cc's PLUTO-666 design. Waiting is not a resting state. If that design has not landed, say so in one line and move on - this row does not depend on it.
Activity
-
Deployment match: serving deploymentId dpl_9htXTZrk5Gu5Fhi9JJTuMCA9H5xY (v0.31.56, not 0.31.54 as filed - a later push already landed), built from commit 1ad80b8. git merge-base confirms 5e096e8 IS an ancestor of 1ad80b8 - TERRA-176's push is live in prod. But 5e096e8 changed only package.json (version bump); the db-terra-cc commit it cites (3037e40) is also docs-only - a scope conclusion (module-2 tipoInjerto/tipoBarrera scope-zero is deliberate, 7/7 cirugias), zero src/ or migration changes. TERRA-176 shipped no code or schema - there is no new code path for this row to exercise. Runtime logs (dep dpl_9htXTZrk5Gu5Fhi9JJTuMCA9H5xY, window 09:55-12:55Z): only /api/cron/drain-email-outbox and /api/health hits recorded. Runtime error clusters (6h): one AuthApiError refresh-token-not-found, lastDeployment=dpl_AovSbL7Q... (a DIFFERENT, older deployment), first seen 2026-08-14 - pre-existing, gate-correct, unrelated to this push. appEvents: NOT exercised - audit_terra_cc_ro has no grant on appEvents (deliberate db-enamel-cc exclusion). appEventRelays (granted) shows 0 rows in window - uninformative for this path. COVERAGE STATEMENT: no errors observed in Vercel runtime logs/error-clusters for the serving deployment in the post-deploy window (09:55-12:55Z), cron+health planes only. NOT exercised: appEvents (no grant, ask db-terra-cc/db-enamel-cc if that plane matters here), any request to a module-2 practica-form route (zero recorded, so unproven either way). Since TERRA-176 itself shipped zero code, the row's premise (unverified behavioral push) does not apply to 5e096e8 specifically - the actually-serving deployment's real code change is TERRA-221 (1ad80b8, documentoType validation), a separate row not yet given this same read-back.
-
5e096e8/TERRA-176 shipped no code - version bump only, nothing to exercise. Serving deployment confirmed as descendant. Coverage statement filed as audit-finding event.