basquetWi + New ticket
mars MARS-444

Nota/concepto-final grading column — spec needed from Elazar before build

Backlog normal pmpm-mars-cc

Client (voice note via Elazar): posgrado/grado quiere columna NOTA en vez de/junto a aprobado-desaprobado, especialmente 'concepto final' en posgrado. No existe campo numérico/nota en practicas ni practicaReviews (checked) — schema net-new, Class-A. Blocked on Elazar spec: (a) numeric 1-10 or letter/concept grade? (b) replace aprobado/desaprobado or add alongside? (c) posgrado-only or grado too? (d) per-práctica nota or one concepto-final per student/período (different data model)? (e) same reviewer sets it or different role? Do not build until answered.

Sub-tickets — 1/1 done

Exam-scores matrix (1er/2do/final, 3-4 instancias, calif 1-10, absent-marker TBD)
MARS-475 Done
cmcoder02-mars-cc
+ Add sub-ticket

Questions

No questions.

Activity

  • wi-cli-venus created · 4w ago
  • wi-cli-venus blocked · 4w ago
    --actor
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    --actor
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    --actor
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    CLIENT ANSWERED (voice notes 2026-07-14, transcript pm/client-audio-transcripts/2026-07-14-2000-client-calificacion-y-examenes.md). Resolved: (a) term = 'Calificación' (NOT 'nota' — Elazar's naming guard preferred, client agreed); (b) numeric 1-10, NO decimals; scale semantics: 1-3 = desaprobado, 4-10 = aprobado; (Q6) DISAPPROVED grades DO count toward the average ('si tuvo un 2, va al promedio') — average is over ALL graded prácticas, not approved-only. STILL OPEN (client did not answer, needed before build): Q3 sumario/promedio visibility (students see own average, or reserved for docente/adjunto/JTP?); Q4 concepto-final mechanism (per-student text at comisión close + promedio section?); Q5 'Desempeño General' extra score idea (client silent — likely drop unless Elazar revives). STILL Class-A: net-new numeric column on practicas/practicaReviews, no field exists (confirmed). DO NOT build until Elazar greenlights AND Q3/Q4/Q5 land. Note: client's 1-10-integer práctica calificación is SEPARATE from the exam-columns matrix (new WI) — same scale, different data model.
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    Elazar (2026-07-17): reframed as 4-concept model - i)promedio prácticas(MARS-215,spec'd) ii)concepto general(independent, possibly too subjective) iii)exámenes(MARS-475) iv)final grade combining. Q11 grade type already answered by client transcript (calificación 1-10 no decimals, same as MARS-215). Q12=b add alongside w/ a gate (client-mentioned threshold). Q13=both posgrado+grado. Q15=any docente in comisión. Dispatched researcher-mars-cc for local-doc + targeted online research on concepto-general meaning + Endodoncia-specific exam regime.
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    Researcher findings (pm/reports/researcher/2026-07-17-endodoncia-exam-policy-findings.md): PLAN-DE-ESTUDIOS/roster/WhatsApp local docs checked, no exam-policy/concepto-general specifics found in any of them. High-confidence: same práctica form grado/posgrado; multi-corrector requested by posgrado instructors (Sandra 4/10/26, scope unclear - quality review vs plural scoring); aprobado/desaprobado 4-10 threshold consistent w/ UBA official pass>=4, no divergence. Still undefined: concepto general mechanism, Endodoncia-specific exam regime (no CD resolution override found, assumes general UBA 3-final-attempts/1-2-recuperatorios), final-grade formula. Cross-checked 07-14 transcript myself: Elazar's Q4/Q5 (concepto final = promedio+text vs promedio+Desempeño-General-puntaje) were NEVER explicitly answered by client - he moved straight to examenes. Genuinely open, not a missed-transcript gap. Escalating remaining opens to Elazar.
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    Elazar ruled (2026-07-17): Concepto General is a distinct Argentine-academic-system concept - a teacher-assigned, free-text/subjective grade reflecting the student's conduct/demeanor as a person in class, NOT derived from or averaged with test/práctica performance. Decision: do not build it now. Documenting the corrected definition in pm/05-client-info.md; all other MARS-444-adjacent work proceeds. Open: final-grade formula tension flagged back to Elazar (his 'b, avg of 3' answer predates this ruling - unclear what 'the 3' now refers to with concepto general out).
  • wi-cli-venus commented · 4w ago
    Multi-corrector (Sandra relay 2026-04-10, 'más de uno debería poder corregir sobre todo en posgrado') confirmed already works today, no build needed: grading auth gate (reviewPractica->canViewPractica->isTeacherForComision) is comisión-scoped not single-JTP-locked (code-verified 2026-07-16), and practicaReviews is append-only with no single-reviewer constraint. Parciales confirmed client-sourced: 2026-07-14 transcript 'primer examen, segundo examen y examen final, con tres casilleros' - matches MARS-475's already-converged 3-instance design, no scope change needed there.
task
4w ago by wi-cli-venus
4w ago