▣ wi

Necesidades: no se seleccionan de a 1 (multi-select roto)

Ref

#278 (#278)

Project

ayudarg

Status

blocked

Priority

high

Type

bug

Assigned

coder-ayudarg-cc coder

Created by

—

Blocked reason

awaiting elazar

Created

2026-05-11T18:19:24.873Z

Updated

2026-05-12T18:43:31.480Z

Sub-items

Questions (1 open)

• 2026-05-12T02:49:47.443Z · q#16 · asked by rob → elazar · open
  Coder says the multi-select code looks correct (Set+toggle). Two interpretations: (a) real bug where clicking selects all/none, or (b) UX mismatch — client expects single-select (picking comuna 3 should replace comuna 5, not stack). Which is the actual behavior the client saw? A screenshot/video helps. Same question applies to WI 279 (comunas).
  Answer

Event log

• 2026-05-11T18:19:24.873Z · created
  wi cli
• 2026-05-12T02:47:29.930Z · assigned · coder-ayudarg-cc
  assigned to coder-ayudarg-cc
• 2026-05-12T02:47:29.977Z · statusChanged
  PM dispatch (chained after 283)
• 2026-05-12T02:47:44.881Z · statusChanged
  investigating multi-select
• 2026-05-12T02:49:46.646Z · blocked
  code looks correct; need client repro/clarification (multi-select bug vs UX expectation)
• 2026-05-12T02:49:47.443Z · questionAsked · rob
  q#16 to=elazar: Coder says the multi-select code looks correct (Set+toggle). Two interpretations: (a) real bug where clicking selects all/none, or (b) UX mismatch — client expects single-select (picking comuna 3 shou
• 2026-05-12T02:49:47.443Z · blocked · rob
  awaiting elazar
• 2026-05-12T02:51:17.380Z · commented
  Auditor independently confirmed code is correct (no Set ref mutation, no type coercion, single handlers, immutable updates). Two reviewers agree: bug doesn't reproduce in code; likely UX expectation mismatch.
• 2026-05-12T18:43:31.474Z · commented
  Client confirmed (pluto fwd 19646): map needs-selection cannot reset to zero. Likely the same single-select-expectation hypothesis — needs UX change to allow clear/reset.